A major aspect of my putting-life-aside-until-I-get-the-freaking-novel done austerity was: I didn't read The Pale King the latest, and last, DFW novel.
Part of it was that I was on a steady (gluttonous, really) diet of research and other books relevant to what I was working on. Part of it was that, when reading DFW, I ineluctably start writing in the style of DFW to an extent that I sound like a literary parodist on meth taking the piss. (Which, obviously, wouldn't do.) And much of it was a simple self-discipline crutch: another much-desired thing I'd only get to do after I finished the damned book.
Anyway, a lot of really totally fascinating DFWabilia has appeared on the web in this time (*) dead, the man just goes from strength to strength and here it is now, starting with a bit of a review of tPK if you're interested. If you're not a DFW fan (really, if you haven't read Infinite Jest), you can definitely stop reading three paragraphs ago.
David Foster Wallace's suicide in 2008 was a shock that will go on reverberating for as long as people remain interested in the novel. Even if you had mixed feelings about his work, there was no doubting his colossal talent and no mistaking his centrality to his generation of American writers. If anyone was going to become the Melville of the corporatised society, the post-natural environment, the pharmacologically altered human landscape we all now inhabit, he was the one…
For all his baroque plotting, Wallace was generally more interesting at the level of the part than the whole. You go to him for the self-contained, usually comic, often staggeringly grotesque riffs and routines at which he excelled, rather than some sustained Jamesian evolution of story out of character. The provisional nature of The Pale King adds to this montage-like effect. You move through it as if through some mildly phantasmagorical gallery, making your own connections as you wander along…
There is a section in double entry columns that consists of little more than a roomful of examiners silently turning the pages of tax returns "Ed Shackleford turns a page. Elpidia Carter turns a page. Ken Wax attaches a Memo 20 to a file. Anand Singh turns a page . . . " On it goes, column after column "Ken Wax turns a page. David Cusk turns a page. Lane Dean Jr rounds his lips and breathes deeply in and out like that and bends to a new file. Ken Wax turns a page . . . " It is one of the strangest, saddest, most haunting things I've ever read.
Now a little music and video! (Hat tip to SNaFu.) The band The Decemberists have recreated the entire Eschaton game from the Year of the Adult Depend Undergarment. This is quality. Connoisseurs will really appreciate the details. (Just getting to see Anne Kittenplan is worth the price of admission alone.) Darned catchy song, too.
We all know about Trekkies. Or those Star Wars super-fans who go to Comic Con dressed up like Boba Fett. But what about all those Infinite Jest worshipers out there? Who can they turn to for obscure references to David Foster Wallace's magnum opus? Well, The Decemberists, of course.
A VISUAL EXPLORATION OF THE FILMOGRAPHY OF JAMES O. INCANDENZA AND THE WORLD OF INFINITE JEST
And what more, really, can be said about that? This started with movie posters for the extensive filmography of Himself, as exhaustively recounted in the IJ footnotes, and has branched out. Extremely clever and obsessive. (And IJ-insightful the text of the entries is well worth reading.) Here are a couple of faves:
Wallace has said that the narrative structure of IJ is that of a Sierpinski Gasket, which is a kind of pyramidical fractal. It was never clear to me (or, rather, beyond my ability to comprehend) quite how a novel could take this form.
But now Ezra Kline, on A Supposedly Fun Blog, reaches the most horrifying and fascinating literary pronouncement I've ever seen: that Infinite Jest IS "Infinite Jest". The book IS The Entertainment or functions a whole hell of a lot like it. Must… reel in… head…
For most of the book, I didnít understand the phenomenon of IJís rereaders. I do now. Itís not because the book is so fun. Itís because of the explosive carnage of the final sections. The destruction of beloved characters forces a frantic search for textual clues that signal a rebirth in their future, or at least create some meaning amidst their fall. I didnít want to reread IJ because I loved the book, but because I wanted a way out of what the book was telling me. And so I could flip back to page one and begin again. And when I didnít find the answer, do it again. And again. What does this sound like?
We knew of two scenes in the Entertainment. A beautiful woman telling you something horrible about the way the world works. A revolving door in which you never quite caught your target. James Incandenza didnít create something entertaining. The title was, as Himself told Joelle, a joke. He created something terrifying. The central theory was outlandish and awful. But people couldnít let go until they found the information that would put their world right again. And that information never came, and so they never left. They just kept running through that revolving door, being told those horrible things again and again, which made them run all the faster.
So too with the book, at least in a miniaturized form. The conclusion is outlandish and awful. And that keeps you from letting go. In a dystopically idealized world, you keep rereading this immense, absorbing book, always looking to explain away the horrifying events of the end, but on each read, your connection to the characters becomes stronger even as the end doesnít clarify. You discover just enough new details and new theories to keep the cycle going, but never enough to resolve it. And the time you spend in the bookís world takes you further and further from the real world. You spin in that revolving door again and again, continually hearing these horrible things.
Honestly not sure whether I'm now more, or less, looking forward to my fourth reading of the beast… Although Klein ends on a lovely, hopeful note.
Reading this book should be a terribly lonely experience. It is so sweeping and detailed and consuming. No one outside the novel can possibly understand what youíre talking about. And if youíre reading it twice? Three times? Before the acceleration of the internet, how many similar obsessives was the average reader likely to run into?
Not here, though. Here, people can understand you… A book that is about loneliness and that creates isolation has been subverted into a communal activity. Instead of being turned into Hal, we enrolled in the Enfield Tennis Academy, sharing a fundamentally strange and obsessing experience, but sharing it nevertheless.
Here's a selection of not-quite-equally-mind-blowing,-but-pretty-mindblowing theories about what's really going on in the stories behind the story.
Finally, here's the long-awaited actual audio of the man himself delivering his celebrated commencement speech at Kenyon College, and which got turned into the book This Is Water. (It's 22 minutes. If you're only going to listen to half, listen to the 2nd half. Definitely listen to the 2nd half.)
Okay, finally finally, here's John Krasinski reading one of my very favourite bits (in a totally horrifying way) from Brief Interviews With Hideous Men. Damned funny. (And horrifying.)
Recall I also wasn't blogging until I finished the damned book