Dispatch from the Razor's Edge, the Blog of Michael Stephen Fuchs
Iraqis Defy Blasts in Strong Turnout for Pivotal Election
Sunnis Go to Polls, This Time, to Retain a Voice
"We are Iraqis. We have had it much worse than this."
- Kamal Fadil, in charge of a polling station in Salhiya

Both of the above headlines are from the New York Times. And if there's one thing for which you can count on the Times, it's not to whitewash goings-on in post-Saddam Iraq.

Iraqis went to the polls for the second time in seven years to vote in national parliamentary elections. (It's been pointed out that it took the U.S. 12 years after 1776 to do it once.) According to the BBC, turnout was 62%. (Which also dwarfs U.S. turnout, when nobody is shooting at us.) Turnout in Anbar Province, a former extremist stronghold that includes Fallujah and Ramadi, was up from 2% last time to 61% now.

"It takes a cynical mind not to share in the achievement of Iraq's national elections. Bombs and missiles, al Qaeda threats and war fatigue failed to deter millions of Iraqis of all sects and regions from exercising a right that is rare in the Arab world. Even the U.N.'s man in Baghdad called the vote 'a triumph'." - Wall Street Journal

"In a country that not so long ago was accustomed to the sham elections that kept Saddam Hussein and his Baath Party in office, this one has turned into a nail-biter between Prime Minister al-Maliki and former interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawi." - Baltimore Sun

I've talked to a number of anti-war people who seem not to have caught the fairly important fact that: We won the war. I sort of thought this went without saying, but I find I have to keep pointing it out.

"Everything is on track for [withdrawal] to happen… The plan is we will continue to turn control over to the Iraqi security forces, and by August we believe we'll be able to end our combat mission and get down to about 50,000 [troops]." - Commanding General Ray Odierno

There were of course a lot of noble reasons for which one might have been opposed to the war. There's still plenty of scope for feeling that the war wasn't worth the cost – not in blood, nor treasure, nor insurgency mayhem, nor (as many saw it) the trampling of international law.

But the fact remains that if the anti-war crowd had gotten their way in 2007, we would have suffered a battlefield defeat at the hands of al Qaeda, handed the center of the Arab world and the world's third-largest oil reserves and 31 million people who trusted us over to the head-hackers and mosque-bombers, and condemned the Iraqi people to even more decades of misery, misrule, imprisonment, and terror.

Instead, we have helped to midwife the first decent, consensual, pluralistic democracy in the Arab Middle East. (I previously argued that this was the most important reason for the intervention – and the only deep and substantive response to 9/11.) We have freed 31 million people from a Stalinist terror state run by a psychopathic crime family. We have allowed the Arab world to see a free and fair democratic election right on their borders – one in which a Shia majority shares power with minority groups – and a vision the theocratic, messianic mullahs of Iran must ardently wish they could cause the people of Iran to unsee.

We've done all this on the backs of the incredibly brave, skilled, devoted, professional, and upright men and women of the U.S. military – and, not to mention, with the indispensible partnership of the extremely brave and cool and long-suffering Iraqi people themselves. Freedom can't really be granted – it can only be won. And the Iraqi people are doing the extremely hard work of securing their own freedom and prosperity, after decades of misery and tyranny and war.

We should wish them all the best. And we should be happy and humbled that the people of Iraq are going to share a bond with the people of America that is certain to last a very, very long time indeed.


  freedom     iraq     middle east  
about
close photo of Michael Stephen Fuchs

Fuchs is the author of the novels The Manuscript and Pandora's Sisters, both published worldwide by Macmillan in hardback, paperback and all e-book formats (and in translation); the D-Boys series of high-tech, high-concept, spec-ops military adventure novels – D-Boys, Counter-Assault, and Close Quarters Battle (coming in 2016); and is co-author, with Glynn James, of the bestselling Arisen series of special-operations military ZA novels. The second nicest thing anyone has ever said about his work was: "Fuchs seems to operate on the narrative principle of 'when in doubt put in a firefight'." (Kirkus Reviews, more here.)

Fuchs was born in New York; schooled in Virginia (UVa); and later emigrated to the San Francisco Bay Area, where he lived through the dot-com boom. Subsequently he decamped for an extended period of tramping before finally rocking up in London, where he now makes his home. He does a lot of travel blogging, most recently of some very  long  walks around the British Isles. He's been writing and developing for the web since 1994 and shows no particularly hopeful signs of stopping.

You can reach him on .

my latest book
ARISEN : Raiders, Volume 5 - The Last Raid by Michael Stephen Fuchs
from email:



to email(s) (separate w/commas):
By subscribing to Dispatch from the Razor’s Edge, you will receive occasional alerts about new dispatches. Your address is totally safe with us. You can unsubscribe at any time. All the cool kids are doing it.
As always, unlimited and unedited space is provided in the Comments section for any reader who would like to respond to or rebut anything appearing here. Anyone with a reasoned (*) opinion is not merely invited, but strongly encouraged, to chime in.